CNSNews: On Monday night, U.S. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) used her authority to table a bill in the Senate that would have prohibited the killing of a child that survives an abortion and instituted penalties for any health worker who killed or tried to kill a baby that survived an abortion.
The legislation, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, was introduced by Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.). When Sasse, on the Senate floor, asked for unanimous consent for the bill to move forward to committee, Sen. Murray objected and did not give her consent. As a result, the bill was stopped.
S. 130 would have condemned infanticide and ensured that babies born alive after an attempted abortion were legally protected and received “the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence” from health care practitioners as would “any other child born alive at the same gestational age.” The bill would have also required that, after receiving this care, abortion survivors were “immediately transported and admitted to a hospital.”
Earlier on Monday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) expressed support for the bill.
“I hope that none of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle invent – invent – any reasons to block this request later today,” McConnell said. “That would make quite a disturbing statement. If they do inexplicably block Senator Sasse’s effort, I can assure them that this will not be the last time we try to ensure that all newborns are afforded this fundamental legal protection.”
Currently, under H.R. 2175, the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002, infants born alive are considered persons who are entitled to legal protections. However, pro-abortion politicians have recently introduced and passed laws that erode these protections and allow newborns to be left to die.
For example, New York’s Reproductive Health Act, signed into law on Jan. 22, repealed section 4164 of New York’s public health law, which had required that babies born alive after an abortion attempt receive “immediate medical care” and “immediate legal protection.”
Additionally, a bill proposed last week in Virginia, H.B. 2491, would have allowed abortion up to birth. Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam (D), while discussing this bill, suggested that a mother and her physician could choose to allow a newborn baby to die.
Sasse emphasized that S. 130 was not about abortion, but about infanticide.
“We are not talking about second-trimester abortion,” he said. “We are not having some big, complicated discussion about a mother’s reproductive freedom. As important as all of those debates are, we are actually talking about babies that have been born.”
“Please don’t let Governor Northam define you,” Sasse implored his colleagues. “Don’t let an extremist pro-abortion lobby and pledge hold you hostage. Please don’t protect infanticide.”
After Sasse finished speaking, Murray stood up and objected to the bill.
“Mr. President, we have laws against infanticide in this country,” Murray said. “This is a gross misinterpretation of the actual language of the bill that is being asked to be considered, and, therefore, I object.”
Sasse said it was “gross” that his colleagues refused to condemn infanticide, and said he and others would “continue to fight for a rollcall vote” to pass the bill if they could not pass it by unanimous consent.
Our comment:
Sick! Where are western societies headed with such a lack of unanimous understanding concerning the evil of infanticide? The Bible predicts that violence and wickedness will increase to the end of time.
Prophetic Link:
“Wickedness is in the midst thereof: deceit and guile depart not from her streets.” Psalm 55:11
Comments
Rosalind Reed
Monday February 25th, 2019 at 08:15 PMYou are a disgrace people in authority like yourself are the reason for the decay in our society I will never vote for you
Will Flatt
Tuesday February 26th, 2019 at 09:34 AMThis issue is just one of MANY reasons why God’s people must have NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the Democrat Party. I’ll leave it to fellow readers of this article if they ought to do likewise with the Republican Party, and the Libertarian Party.
admin
Tuesday February 26th, 2019 at 08:08 PMI don’t understand it either. But we are to avoid political controversy over anything that is not related to referendums addressing the moral principles of the 10 commandments. We are not to be involved in parties Democrat, Republican or Libertarian or Independent. The Republicans have their own set of problems. See FE 475. God’s people have a much higher calling – to give the 3 Angels Message and under the latter rain represent Christ who never engaged in political matters or involved Himself in social reforms, resistance movements, etc. And He lived under a far more brutal regime that most of us live under today. –Admin
Frances Norland
Tuesday February 26th, 2019 at 06:41 PMShame on you! Next will be to euthanize our seniors…. May God have mercy on your soul.
Michael Bisson
Wednesday February 27th, 2019 at 08:10 AMJesus never involved himself in political abuses inflicted by the Romans, because He had no first amendment right to do so. Sister white was so outspoken about slavery that her writings were not allowed in the slave states.
Donna Gremmert
Wednesday February 27th, 2019 at 10:33 AMPatty Murray,
Am praying for your heart, soul, and mind.