Desculpe, este conteúdo só está disponível em Inglês (Eua) e Espanhol Europeu.
-
Pastor Hal Mayer
Speaker / Director
The U.S. House Tax Bill would Essentially Unite Church and State
segunda, 4 de dezembro de 2017
Prophetic Intelligence Briefings are provided to show a link between current events and Bible prophecy only. The reposted articles, which are not intended as a commentary in support of or in opposition to the views of the authors, do not necessarily reflect the views of Pastor Mayer or of Keep the Faith other than to point out the prophetic link.
Latest Message
Make a Gift
Prophetically Speaking…
“The most odious of all oppressions are those which mask as justice.” more…
-
Artigos recentes
- Supreme Court ruling may create ‘unavoidable conflict’ between religious liberty, LGBT ideology, group warns
- Israeli warplanes pound Syria as troops reportedly advance deeper into the country
- Prophetically Speaking…
- Pastor fighting to keep realtor license after complaints about biblical social media posts
- Prophetically Speaking…
Tags
Catholic Church church and state Donald Trump government LGBTQ natural disaster politics Pope Francis Prophetically Speaking Quote of the Day religion religious liberty United States VaticanComentários recentes
- William Stroud em China’s second mass attack in a week spurs soul-searching
- William Stroud em School Cancels Handel’s ‘Messiah’ Performance Amid Backlash Over Christian Music
- William Stroud em Ontario town fined $10,000 for refusing to celebrate pride month
- Will F em Christian voters swayed 2024 presidential election, data show
- Andi Q em Agenda47: President Trump’s Plan to Dismantle the Deep State and Return Power to the American People
Follow
Comments
timesandlaws.com
terça, 5 de dezembro de 2017 at 09:42Johnson an evil man from Texas, which here in Texas we actually know why he wanted that bill. It was to control the voice of the Pastors, that by being a non profit, you could no longer give voice to opposition of political power. His bill is why Preachers do not speak evil against evil in the government, because a 501 c3 would be revoked and the churches would have to pay huge fees. All churches before Johnsons bill were already exempt from paying taxes, and had protections, his bill was protecting from people in churches speaking against the government, hence giving government more control and is why SDA does not speak against Rome or the Image of Rome. And meanwhile…. SDA already signed on to Rome and Church and State by being a 501 c3, therefore if you are a corporation, you must abide by its rules…. hence why you must not discriminate against transgenders, bisexuals, etc. That is why a corporation like sda must comply. Any 501c3 must abide by the rules they signed up to…. including when and if they say you must keep Sunday.
timeofnoah.org
quinta, 7 de dezembro de 2017 at 13:39Just to ad more to the comment posted above. Church and State has been a reality in the US for a long time. Every corporation belongs to the State. Church and ministries that have been incorporated are creatures of the State and thus fulfilling the prophecy of Revelation 13 in regards to the image of the beast.
“No corporation can exist without the consent or grant of the sovereign, since the corporation is a creature of the state and derives its powers by legislative grant. The power to create corporations is one of the attributes of sovereignty. There is no inherent right to conduct business as a corporation. The right to act as a corporation does not belong to citizens by common right, but is a special privilege conferred by the sovereign power of the state or nation. Until there is a grant of that right, whether by a special charter or under a general law, there can be no corporation. Any means of incorporation that a state sees fit to adopt are appropriate. “The right to conduct business as a corporation, being a privilege, may be withheld by the state, or may be made subject to appropriate terms and restrictions. Because
the granting of the privilege to be a corporation and to do business in that form rests entirely in the state’s discretion, a state is justified in imposing such conditions on that privilege as it deems necessary, so long as those conditions are not imposed in a discriminatory manner.”
American Jurisprudence 2d
Whether the Johnson Amendment is eliminated or not makes absolutely no difference when it comes to the unity of church and state. It would be simply the other side of the same coin. Whether State directs Church or Church Directs State, the bottom line is, it is still the unity between church and state. Thus the Image of the Beast has been formed in the US already. It only needs to speak now in regards to Sunday observance. Every incorporated church and ministry has the State as it’s sovereign. This is in direct violation of the God’s principles who alone can be the Sovereign of His Church and Christ the head of it. May God help us all….
MJ
sexta, 8 de dezembro de 2017 at 19:04The “Johnson Amendment” as of Sept 14, 2017 has been “DE-fanged”. It cannot be completely taken off the books until the U.S. has a Constitutional Convention.
However no infraction of its prohibitions will be prosecuted, consequently its already gone.
Question: How much more evidence do we expect to see before we take seriously the threat of a National Sunday Law – soon?
What previous U.S. Administration promised to give Evangelicals, “whatever they want”, “to destroy the wall of separation between church and state?
Don’t be surprised if the National Sunday Law is buried or otherwise goes unnoticed in a hastily passed Bill. Bill are no longer monolithic. The Evangelical world will be elated and praise the government for turning back to god! And isn’t this the real reason why this Administration is in power, to force the conscience and establish worship to the enemy?
admin
domingo, 10 de dezembro de 2017 at 11:29The Johnson amendment is not a constitutional provision. It is an amendment to the IRS tax law relating to 501c3 organizations. It only takes an act of Congress to repeal or change it officially, not a constitutional convention.