Timely and Inspiring Prophetic Analysis so you can Prepare.

Comments

• • 

  • Craig Swift

    sexta, 26 de agosto de 2016 at 13:15
  • Responder
  
  

  Here is the ruling or so called mandate. It does not mandate or require religious organizations to provide contraceptives https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/07/02/2013-15866/coverage-of-certain-preventive-services-under-the-affordable-care-act

  They only had to fill out a form t get exempt and the mainly Catholic Organizations didn’t want to fill out a form?

  This article is filled with misinformation from the Catholic News Agency.

  the State Department was “highly rhetorical” and “program-poor” said Farr. “Under her watch, the National Security Strategy’s discussion of fundamental American values virtually ignored religious freedom,” he said. The Clinton State Department “accomplished virtually nothing (other than a few fine speeches and reports) in the arena of religious freedom,” he added

  What does that even mean? What laws, rules or mandates did they want enacted by the State Department that promoted the fundamental values of religious freedom?

  What product is she trying to sell Religious Freedom? Isn’t the best way of the government selling it is by staying mostly out of the way unless it’s threatened? Which is exactly what the State Department did under Clinton? So reading this article it’s saying they want to government involved but only by pushing their definition or brand of religious freedom and of course their brand and definition is correct and all other not so much? https://www.hopechannel.com/read/hillary-clinton-speaking-up-for-religious-freedom

  
  
• • 

  • Craig Swift

    sexta, 26 de agosto de 2016 at 13:17
  • Responder
  
  

  http://carnegieendowment.org/2012/07/29/secretary-of-state-hillary-clinton-on-international-religious-freedom-event-3752

  
  
  • • 

    • admin

      sexta, 26 de agosto de 2016 at 19:01
    • Responder
    
    

    It appears that this is one of Clinton’s speeches. When analyzed carefully, it makes no statements of concrete actions or policy decisions. Those pushing same-sex marriage and abortion cannot restrain themselves from impinging on the religious freedom of individuals and organizations as demonstrated in the history of these issues in the last few years. Government leaders and candidates, including Clinton are under enormous pressure from gay rights groups and from women’s groups, etc., to restrict religious individuals and organizations from accommodation in government policy. Hilary would clearly not be a sterling supporter of those religious freedom rights, similar to President Obama. Clinton’s history (as also Obama) is pushing in the opposite direction.

    Concerning the IRS regulations, and whether it requires religious organizations to comply with Obamacare guidelines… The historic definition of religious freedom applies to individuals, not merely religious organizations. Therefore religious freedom extends to individuals operating in the public space including for-profit entities run by religious individuals. The IRS code does not provide exemptions for these individuals and their related entities in the final regulations of the Affordable Care act. The relevant quotation from the linked document is listed below.

    “Some commenters requested that the definition of eligible organization be broadened to include nonprofit secular employers and for-profit employers with religious objections to contraceptive coverage…
    “The Departments decline to adopt these suggestions… The definition of eligible organization in these final regulations does not extend to for-profit organizations.”

    
    
• • 

  • Nancy C.

    segunda, 29 de agosto de 2016 at 10:45
  • Responder
  
  

  You never comment on Donald Trump stand on this we should remember these are secular people no matter what party they represent, they will follow what the trend and majority wants.
  Donald Trump flip flops he will also do the same things which he always does just to get votes and to me he is Americas worst and dangerous candidate. Wish I could hear more from you about Donald Trump what he stands for and will really do as president of the United States!

  
  
  • • 

    • admin

      quarta, 7 de setembro de 2016 at 21:44
    • Responder
    
    

    In our search engine, type “Donald Trump” and you’ll see the many things that we have said about him, and his dangerous views about religion, rule of law, etc. It’s interesting, someone recently said that we had little to say about Hillary (after one of our blogs on Donald Trump). Now its the opposite. Check our site. You’ll see what we’ve said. Blessings, Pr. Mayer