Desculpe, este conteúdo só está disponível em Inglês (Eua) e Espanhol Europeu.
-
Pastor Hal Mayer
Speaker / Director
Gunman Asked Students their Religion before Shooting Them
segunda, 12 de outubro de 2015
Prophetic Intelligence Briefings are provided to show a link between current events and Bible prophecy only. The reposted articles, which are not intended as a commentary in support of or in opposition to the views of the authors, do not necessarily reflect the views of Pastor Mayer or of Keep the Faith other than to point out the prophetic link.
Latest Message
Make a Gift
Prophetically Speaking…
“The most odious of all oppressions are those which mask as justice.” more…
-
Artigos recentes
- Supreme Court ruling may create ‘unavoidable conflict’ between religious liberty, LGBT ideology, group warns
- Israeli warplanes pound Syria as troops reportedly advance deeper into the country
- Prophetically Speaking…
- Pastor fighting to keep realtor license after complaints about biblical social media posts
- Prophetically Speaking…
Tags
Catholic Church church and state Donald Trump government LGBTQ natural disaster politics Pope Francis Prophetically Speaking Quote of the Day religion religious liberty United States VaticanComentários recentes
- William Stroud em China’s second mass attack in a week spurs soul-searching
- William Stroud em School Cancels Handel’s ‘Messiah’ Performance Amid Backlash Over Christian Music
- William Stroud em Ontario town fined $10,000 for refusing to celebrate pride month
- Will F em Christian voters swayed 2024 presidential election, data show
- Andi Q em Agenda47: President Trump’s Plan to Dismantle the Deep State and Return Power to the American People
Follow
Comments
Jason W
segunda, 12 de outubro de 2015 at 12:09This attack has one criteria that is a constant in the majority if not all of the shootings that have occurred. They are all “gun-free” zones. The attacker knew that no one could stop the attack. If it had not been a “gun-free” zone then there would have been the potential that it could have been stopped. If the attacker knew that someone might have had the means to stop them, then that in itself would have been a deterrent. The attackers in these situations know that the people they are going to attack are “sitting ducks” and that they will not be able to stop the attack. I do not believe that this was classified as a hate crime, but it truly was. If I recall correctly the attacker in this case had been seeking help and they knew they were not stable. The system let this man down and all of the victims. This is just another excuse to try to control our amendment right to self defense. When these attacks occur many people blame “guns” rather than the person and the system that allows it to happen in the first place. Guns do not kill people without a person pulling the trigger! Remember that if guns are outlawed then only outlaws will have guns!
Dennis
quinta, 15 de outubro de 2015 at 11:15I agree with Jason W. We can learn from history what is possible when the populace is not allowed to protect themselves. After World War II, the people of Japan had no firearms. Only the military possessed weapons. Compare that with the general population in the United States during World War II. If any Japanese forces had landed on the west coast, they would not have gotten very far. Every wife, mother, and grandmother would have pulled out their shotguns. The ethics of this can be discussed, but from a societal viewpoint, self-preservation is equated with freedom from tyranny.